This article is written by guest contributor, Dave Meynell, a Senior Technical Adviser for the ICC Banking Commission, who discusses the International Standard Banking Practice (ISBP), common challenges in applying it, and the advantages of adhering to it.
The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of ICC Academy or ICC.
Understanding the International Standard Banking Practice (ISBP)
The International Standard Banking Practice publication (ISBP) was introduced by the International Chamber of Commerce (ICC) as a complement to the Uniform Customs and Practice for Documentary Credits (UCP), which governs the use of documentary credits in international trade. ISBP was first published in 2003 as ISBP 645, responding to the need for detailed guidance to assist banks and businesses in interpreting and applying the UCP rules more consistently. Its primary aim is to standardise the practices and procedures used by banks in the examination of documents presented under credits.
Over the years, the ISBP has undergone several revisions to reflect changes in trade finance practices and to address issues that have emerged in the interpretation of the UCP. ISBP 681 in 2007 provided alignment with UCP 600, whilst ISBP 745 in 2013 encompassed updates in line with market practice. The 2023 revision, resulting in ISBP 821, continued this evolution by aligning with recently published ICC Opinions.
International Standard Banking Practice (ISBP)
Access the 2023 edition of the ISBP, the essential guide for trade finance professionals, ensuring your documents align with the latest ICC-approved practices and UCP 600 standards.
The ISBP plays a crucial role in documentary credit practice by providing a detailed framework that helps standardise the examination of documents presented under UCP 600. By offering clear and precise guidelines, the ISBP helps ensure that banks and trading partners have a common understanding of the requirements and expectations for document examination. This calibration reduces the risk of misunderstandings and discrepancies, thereby facilitating smoother and more efficient trade transactions. The ISBP’s role in enhancing consistency and predictability in the handling of documentary credits cannot be overstated, as it helps build trust and reliability in international trade finance.
It is important to note that ISBP does not amend UCP 600. It explains how practices articulated in UCP 600 are to be applied by documentary credit practitioners. ISBP and the UCP should be read in holistically and not in isolation.
The incorporation of ISBP into the terms of a documentary credit is inappropriate, as the requirement to follow agreed practices is implicit in UCP 600. Applied correctly, ISBP helps reduce the large percentage of documents refused for discrepancies on first presentation.
One of the key benefits of the ISBP is its ability to bridge the gap between the general principles set out in UCP 600 and the practical realities of document examination. While UCP 600 provides the overarching rules for documentary credits, the ISBP offers detailed guidance on how these rules should be applied in specific situations. This approach helps to minimise the risk of discrepancies and disputes which can arise when there is ambiguity or lack of clarity by users in the application of the rules.
In essence, the ISBP:
- outlines standard practice globally, based on worldwide feedback from ICC National Committees
- provides an intelligent checklist of procedures for document checkers to follow in examining documents presented under documentary credits
- helps reduce the large percentage of documents refused for discrepancies on first presentation
- explains how practices articulated in UCP 600 are applied by documentary practitioners
- provides a framework under which a beneficiary may prepare its documents to a certain standard that can be accepted on a global basis.
It outlines several key principles that are essential for the examination of documents under credits, including:
- confidence that all parties involved in a transaction adhere to uniform practices, reducing the risk of discrepancies.
- provision of comprehensive guidance on the examination of various types of documents, including commercial invoices, transport documents, insurance documents, and certificates.
- clear clarification and explanation of terms used in documentary credits, helping to avoid ambiguities and misunderstandings.
- certainty that all practices are in line with the provisions of UCP 600.
While UCP 600 sets out the general rules and principles, the ISBP delves into the specifics of how these rules should be applied in practice. This relationship between UCP 600 and ISBP ensures that there is a comprehensive framework for the handling of credits, covering both the overarching principles and the detailed procedures.
The ISBP also serves as a valuable resource for training and education by helping to ensure that all parties involved in documentary credit transactions have a thorough understanding of the requirements and best practices.
2023 updates to the ISBP
ISBP 821 introduced several important updates to enhance the processing of transactions under UCP 600. It ensures that ISBP is now fully aligned with the content of all ICC Opinions approved since the release of ISBP 745 up till 2023.
Specific ISBP paragraphs are now included ensuring understanding of the following:
- Absence of a credit reference number, or the mistyping of a credit reference number, on a document is not a valid reason for refusal
- Administrative conditions such as a requirement for an additional photocopy of all documents, or a statement that all documents may not be stapled, should not be incorporated by an issuing bank in a credit
- The abbreviation “Ind.” can be used instead of “Industries”
- No requirement for the applicant’s name, address and contact details (if any) to appear in a specific box, field or space on an invoice.
- Copies of documents need not be signed
- An invoice presented under a credit issued in USD, bearing only the “$‟ sign without further qualification, fulfils the requirement of UCP 600 sub-article 18 (a) (iii) unless data in the invoice itself, or another presented document, implies that the “$‟ sign may refer to a currency other than USD
- The signature of the master (captain) may be accompanied by a stamp that incorporates the name of the vessel
- UCP 600 does not require that an agent or proxy is to be named in an insurance document
These alignments will eliminate friction in all the above areas and provide more explicit instructions on how banks should handle these aspects, reducing the potential for disputes and discrepancies.
ISBP 821
Get the ISBP 821 e-book, the go-to resource for examining documents under documentary credits, aiding beneficiaries and reflecting ICC-negotiated practices.
Common challenges in applying the ISBP
Despite the detailed guidance provided by the ISBP, practitioners often encounter several common challenges and misunderstandings when applying these standards. These issues can lead to discrepancies, delays, and disputes in the handling of documentary credits.
One common issue is the misinterpretation of the terms and requirements outlined in the ISBP. Another frequent challenge is the handling of document discrepancies. The ISBP provides detailed guidance on how to identify and address discrepancies in presented documents, but practitioners still struggle with this aspect. Incorrectly identifying discrepancies or failing to communicate them promptly can lead to delays and disputes, as the parties may not have a clear understanding of the requirements.
Some typical discrepancy examples include:
– The description of goods on the commercial invoice does not match the description in the credit
– Required signatures are missing or not authenticated
– Dates on transport documents do not align with the dates specified in the credit
– Insurance certificates do not provide the required coverage or fail to include necessary details
The ISBP provides detailed guidance on how to address these issues, ensuring that banks can make informed decisions about the acceptability of documents. By following the ISBP guidelines, banks can reduce the risk of disputes and ensure that all parties have a clear understanding of the requirements.
For example, in the case of an incorrect description of goods, the ISBP provides guidelines on how to assess the accuracy and consistency of the information presented in the commercial invoice.
Similarly, the ISBP provides detailed instructions on how to verify signatures on documents. This includes guidance on the acceptability of electronic signatures and the specific requirements for verifying their authenticity.
Applying the ISBP
Applying the ISBP effectively requires a thorough understanding of its guidelines and principles.
It is essential to ensure that all staff involved in document examination are thoroughly trained on the ISBP publication and understand the specific requirements for each type of document. Organisations should maintain clear and consistent communication with all parties involved in the transaction, including the applicant, beneficiary, and other banks.
Procedures must be in place to promptly address any discrepancies or issues that arise. It is also good practice to maintain accurate and detailed records of all transactions, including copies of all presented documents and correspondence. This helps in resolving disputes and ensuring compliance with the ISBP guidelines.
Particular care should be paid to the first two sections of ISBP: Preliminary Considerations and General Principles.
As stated in Preliminary Considerations, many of the problems that arise at the document examination stage could be avoided or resolved by the respective parties through careful attention to detail in the credit or amendment application and issuance of the credit or any amendment thereto. The applicant and beneficiary should carefully consider the documents required for presentation, by whom they are to be issued, their data content and the time frame in which they are to be presented.
Furthermore, the applicant bears the risk of any ambiguity in its instructions to issue or amend a credit. An issuing bank may, unless the applicant expressly instructs to the contrary, supplement or develop those instructions in a manner necessary or desirable to permit the use of the credit or any amendment thereto. An issuing bank should ensure that any credit or amendment it issues is not ambiguous or conflicting in its terms and conditions.
The General Principles section provides numerous clarifications on the examination of documents in respect to issues such as abbreviations, corrections, dates, issuers, language, mathematical calculations, misspellings, non-documentary conditions, originals and copies, signatures, and many other matters.
Why adhere to the ISBP?
Adhering to the ISBP significantly reduces the risks and potential for disputes in trade finance transactions. By providing clear and standardised guidelines, the ISBP ensures that all parties have a common understanding of the requirements for document examination. This reduces the likelihood of discrepancies and misunderstandings, which are common sources of disputes under documentary credits.
The ISBP plays a crucial role in facilitating smoother international trade transactions by enhancing consistency and predictability in the handling of documentary credits. By standardising practices across different banks and jurisdictions, the ISBP helps ensure that transactions are processed efficiently and reliably. This builds trust and confidence among trading partners, encouraging more robust international trade relationships.
Adhering to the ISBP also has a significant impact on compliance and operational efficiency. By following standardised practices, banks can streamline their operations and reduce the time and resources required for document examination. This enhances overall operational efficiency and ensures that transactions are processed in a timely manner. Additionally, compliance with ISBP guidelines helps banks meet regulatory requirements and avoid potential legal and financial liabilities.
In conclusion, the ISBP is an essential framework for standardising the application of documentary credits in international trade. Applied correctly, ISBP helps reduce the large percentage of documents refused for discrepancies on first presentation.
What are the next steps?
ICC National Committees have been approached to decide whether further revisions are required for ISBP. Three options have been given:
- maintain the current version of ISBP 821, or,
- initiate a limited revision of the 45 identified issues, or,
- move forward with a full, formal revision process.
A final decision will be made during the final quarter of 2024.
Further learning
Take your understanding of documentary credits and trade finance further with one of our internationally recognised, online courses and certifications:
Documentary Credits Course Bundle
Take your knowledge of documentary credits from foundational to advanced in eight hours by combining our two dedicated documentary credit courses.
The Global Trade Certificate (GTC) is our foundational programme designed to provide a comprehensive understanding of trade finance. This certification covers a wide array of trade finance techniques and settlement methods.
As a GTC student, you will have access to 14 individual courses that delve into topics such as documentary credits, guarantees, standby letters of credit, and supply chain finance, among others. Upon completing nine of these courses, you will be eligible to sit for the final exam. Successful completion of the exam earns you an internationally recognised ICC Academy certificate, enhancing your career prospects and paving the way for advanced qualifications like the Certified Trade Finance Professional (CTFP).
